The research is finally in, and it confirms what my own personal supercomputer revealed over a year ago: Some of you aren't representing:
In most online systems, 90% of users are lurkers who never contribute, 9% of users contribute a little, and 1% of users account for almost all the action.
Now might be a golden opportunity to clear the air, seeing as I've given you this great opening. :)
6 comments:
And...if you use an rss reader like a good techy geek would (like I do) then it's even easier to read and never contribute. Thanks for the motivation man.
Does the contribution have to be substantive?
well...i leave a little remark here and there!
i have this nagging fear of over-representing. But at least i show my face when i feel so led...your posts often provoke thoughts or comments in my mind...usually i just don't feel eloquent enough to actually write anything.
but I know what it's like to have what you write be appreciated and understood (or not), so occasionally i'll overstep my qualms and type away.
like now. (:
if you use an rss reader...
I suspect that RSS, in relation to leaving comments (or not) is an issue for quite a few of us these days. Hopefully the next generation of RSS readers will work more hand-in-glove with blogging platforms...being able to comment from inside a reader would be cool.
Does the contribution have to be substantive?
Ha ha ha.
i have this nagging fear of over-representing.
That's the kind of fear you take out back and put down. ;) I appreciate your modesty, though.
Does the contribution have to be substantive?
Absolutely. You may not know it, but this site had a complex comment screening process. All comments submitted to Bitterwhatevertheheckthissiteiscalled get scanned by the Bittertron 3000, a supercomputer so powerful that it once checkmated Garry Kasparov in one move. A full explanation of it's inner workings and behavior would take years, but in short, when a comment is submitted, the Bittertron reads it, groks it, and then, and this is the tricky part, does nothing at all*. I know, it's hard to grasp, it's so Zen-like, so ephemeral. Why even have the Bittertron involved at all? What purposes does it serve**? These are excellent questions indeed.
* This is somewhat inaccurate. Occasionally the Bittertron 3000 introduces spelling errors. And bad puns.
** One could ask these questions of many things. Paris Hilton, the Wiggles, Benny Hinn all come to mind.
"You may not know it, but this site had a complex comment screening process..."
That's just hilarious.
Post a Comment